Melbourne Importer Cashflow Map (2026): GST, Duty, Freight & the 30–70 Day Inventory Gap

Melbourne importer cashflow map for business owners | Switchboard Finance

📦 melbourne importer · gst + duty · inventory gap · Business Owners Finance Hub · 2026
Melbourne Importer Cashflow Map (2026): GST, Duty, Freight & the 30–70 Day Inventory Gap — Pick LOC vs Working Capital

Importing is one of the cleanest “profit on paper, stress in the bank account” businesses. The pain isn’t your margin — it’s timing: cash leaves on arrival (GST/duty/freight), but returns slowly as stock turns.

This guide gives you a simple importer timeline, then shows how to choose the right lane: Business Line of Credit (your flexible buffer), vs Working Capital Loans (a fixed “gap fill”), vs invoice-driven options when your customers pay on terms. For government-level importing basics, see business.gov.au importing guidance.

Two definitions you’ll keep bumping into as an importer: GST (the cash hit that often arrives before sales), and Trade Terms (who pays what, and when, in your shipment).

If you want the “cashflow lanes” big-picture explainer first, start here: Invoice Finance for Growing SMEs. Then use this map to pick the cleanest facility for your importer cycle.


1) The importer timeline: where cash leaves vs where it comes back

Most Melbourne importers don’t “run out of profit” — they run out of runway. The bank balance drops in a tight window (arrival + clearance + freight), then recovers over 30–70 days as inventory sells.

If you don’t map the cycle, the consequence is repeat “urgent top-ups” that look random to a lender. A simple timeline turns it into a planned facility decision.

Stage Typical timing What happens Cash impact
Order placed Day 0 Supplier deposit / production starts Cash out (often before any sales)
In transit Days 7–35 Freight + broker coordination, docs finalised Small outs, but pressure builds
Arrival + clearance Days 20–45 GST/duty/freight/handling payable to release goods Big cash out in a tight window
Inventory held Days 30–70 Stock sits, sells, ships, returns happen Cash stuck as inventory
Sales convert to cash Days 35–90 POS / wholesale invoices settle Cash back in (often staggered)
Real-life example (Melbourne): A small homewares importer had a “healthy” gross margin, but every shipment caused a 3–4 week cash dip. They weren’t losing money — they were timing-mismatched, and paying GST/duty before the stock had sold through.

2) Pick the facility: LOC vs working capital vs invoice finance

You’re not choosing a product — you’re choosing a behaviour. Importers win when the facility matches the cycle (short, repeatable gaps) instead of forcing a messy refinance every shipment.

If the wrong tool is used, the consequence is re-work: new submissions, new questions, and “why is this drawn down again?” conversations. Use this quick table to pick the cleanest lane.

Facility Best for Importer use-case Fastest discipline
Business Line of Credit Recurring, flexible gaps Cover clearance week (GST/duty/freight), then cycle down as sales land Draw → clear stock → repay in clean chunks
Working Capital Loan One defined gap with a set plan Fund a specific shipment cycle when you want a fixed structure Match term to sell-through window
Invoice Finance When customers pay on terms Wholesale/B2B invoices (e.g., 14–45 day accounts) after stock ships Finance invoices, not inventory

Want a deeper explainer on the “three-lane” setup? See Business Cashflow System (WCL + LOC + Invoice). If you’re actively comparing LOC structures, start with the guide: Business Line of Credit Guide.

Real-life example (Melbourne): A specialty food importer used a LOC only for clearance week, then repaid it every time the first two wholesale accounts settled. The lender liked it because the facility behaved predictably instead of “staying maxed”.

3) The approval-ready submission order (to avoid re-work)

Importer files get delayed when the lender can’t see the cycle: how the money leaves, how it comes back, and how you’ll keep the facility “clean”. You’re not trying to be perfect — you’re trying to be easy to understand quickly.

If your story arrives in fragments, the consequence is clarification loops (and sometimes a full re-assessment). Send it once, in order, and cut the back-and-forth.

Submission order (send as one bundle):
  • Page 1: 1-page cashflow map (arrival week costs + sell-through window + repayment rhythm).
  • Page 2: Shipment snapshot (supplier terms, freight/broker costs, landed cost summary).
  • Page 3: Sales pathway (how stock converts to cash: retail vs wholesale, average time-to-cash).
  • Pages 4–6: Bank statement highlights (what to ignore, what repeats, what’s “one-off”).
  • Page 7: Facility behaviour plan (when you draw, when you repay, what “good” looks like).

If your lender keeps pushing “tax proof” questions into a cashflow discussion, this companion read helps: Low Doc Loans for ATO & BAS. For the core working capital explainer (as a “winner seed” to anchor the concept), use: Working Capital Loans 2025.

Real-life example (Melbourne): An apparel importer kept sending “extra screenshots” after lodging. The lender treated each update as a new data point and re-asked earlier questions. Once the borrower packaged a single cashflow map + repayment rhythm, the file stopped looping.
Summary

Importers don’t fail because of margin — they fail because cash leaves early (arrival/clearance) and returns late (sell-through). If your facility matches the cycle, approvals and day-to-day stress both get easier.

Use a Business Line of Credit for repeatable clearance-week gaps, use Working Capital Loans for a defined shipment gap, and use invoice-based funding when customers pay you on terms.

FAQ

Timing
Choice
Delays
Speed
Fit

Disclaimer: This content is general information only and isn’t financial, legal, or tax advice.

Previous
Previous

Civil Gear Low Doc Documents Checklist (2026)

Next
Next

How an NDIS Provider Smoothed 14–35 Day Payments Using Invoice Finance vs LOC