Using Company or Trust Property as Security for a Loan
Property Lending Hub
Company Constitution · Trust Deed · Property Security
Property held by a company or a trust can be offered as security, but the funder is really lending against the authority behind the signature. Here is what a lender checks, tier by tier, and where these files commonly stall.
Quick Answer
A company or trust can put its property up as security, including for a loan owed by a different entity. What decides it is not the property but the authority behind the signature: for a company the constitution, for a trust the trust deed, and for a corporate trustee both at once. Legal power and lender policy are separate questions, so find those documents, and every variation, before you apply, because that is where these files stall.
Also called: property held in a company, company owned property as security, corporate trustee security, trust held property.
| Where you are | Start with | What to do next |
|---|---|---|
| Thinking about using the property, nothing applied for yet | What happens, in order, then the documents a lender needs | Ask your accountant for the documents on the list below before you speak to any funder |
| A lender or its solicitor has asked for the trust deed or the constitution | Where each document usually is | Get certified copies of everything, every variation included, and tell your broker straight away if anything is missing |
| The original trust deed cannot be found | Where each document usually is, then the question on a lost deed further down | Speak to the trust's solicitor before a settlement date is fixed, not after |
| The file has stalled because of a missing or defective document | What stops a company owned property being used as security and security for another entity's debt | Fix the document before changing funder, because the next funder will read the same deed |
| A lender has declined because it does not lend where a trust or company holds the security | How private and non-bank funders assess the file | Here a different funder is the fix, because the no is lender policy rather than a problem with your documents |
| The property is in a unit trust and another unitholder is not in the business | Unit trusts with unitholders outside the business | Talk to the other unitholder before the funder does, because their consent decides whether the property can be offered |
| The loan has settled and you want to change the trustee, a director or the deed | What needs the funder's consent once the loan is in place | Ask the funder before making the change, not after |
| The trust wants to borrow for itself, to buy or refinance property | Borrowing through a family trust, which covers that case in full | Start there; this page is about the trust's property securing someone else's debt |
| The business owes the tax office or other creditors and the property is the obvious security | How a tax debt is paid out at settlement and consolidating business debt against property | Confirm which entity owns the property before assuming it can secure the business's debt |
| The property is in your own name and the business is the borrower | Using your own property behind a business loan, which is a different question | Start there instead of here |
| You are still deciding whether a company or a trust should own the property | Your accountant first, then restructuring a property portfolio | Ask how the choice changes who signs and who guarantees, not only the tax |
| The property is held in a self managed super fund | Property held in a self managed super fund | Speak to the fund's adviser before any funder |
Can a company or trust use its property as security for a loan?
A company and a trust can both use property as security for a loan, but for different reasons. A company can because it owns the property in its own name as a separate legal person, so the first question is what its company constitution lets it do with it. A trust cannot own anything at all: a trust structure is not a legal person, so the trustee owns the property, in its own name, subject to obligations owed to the beneficiaries, and the deed decides what the trustee may do with it. That is the whole structure in one line: the trustee holds it, the beneficiaries benefit from it. It is also a different role from a security trustee, which holds a security interest on behalf of a lender or a group of lenders rather than holding property for beneficiaries.
Three levers decide whether a funder will take the security, and none of them is about the property itself. The deed has to give the trustee power to mortgage trust assets, the trustee has to follow the process the deed sets out, and the person putting pen to paper has to actually hold that authority on the day.
A title search will show the trustee's name, sometimes with a notation that it holds as trustee and sometimes with nothing at all, which is why a funder never relies on the title search on its own. The consequence is that the security question is really an authority question. The deed has to let you do this.
Most modern discretionary and trading trust deeds carry a broad power to borrow, to mortgage, and to give guarantees. Older deeds and deeds written for a single narrow purpose sometimes do not, and a deed varied three times over twenty years is often the file where the power exists in one document and is qualified in another.
The Australian Government's guidance on trust structures sets out the same division of roles, describing the trustee as the party that legally holds and operates the assets and the beneficiaries as the parties that benefit. That is exactly the split a funder is testing when it reads the deed.
None of this makes trust-held property harder to fund. It makes it a document exercise before it is a credit exercise, and across the property-secured lanes, from caveat loans through to commercial property loans, the entity on title is what decides which lane is available and how long the paperwork takes.
What happens after you decide to use the property?
The loan runs through the same stages as any property-secured facility, with one extra layer at every stage: somebody has to prove that the entity on title can give the security. The order below shows where that layer sits.
| Stage | What happens | Who does it | What usually holds it up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before you apply | You confirm which entity is on title and collect its authority documents | You and your accountant | The documents sit with a former adviser, or nobody knows where the original deed is |
| Application | The funder assesses the loan and issues an approval conditional on the entity documents | Your broker and the funder | An approval arrives before anyone has read the deed or the constitution |
| Title and entity checks | The title search and the company extract are matched against the deed or the constitution | The funder's solicitor | Names, trustee capacity or directors do not line up across the three |
| Document review | The deed or constitution and every variation are read for the power to give this security, and the resolution is settled | The funder's solicitor, with the entity's solicitor | A power is missing, a variation cannot be produced, or the resolution is dated after the documents |
| Signing | The trustee or the directors sign the mortgage, and the people who control the structure usually sign guarantees | Directors, trustees and guarantors | A signer is unavailable, or a funder asks a guarantor to get independent legal advice first |
| Settlement | The mortgage is registered on the entity's title and the funds are released | Both solicitors | A document fixed late moves the settlement date |
| After settlement | Changing the trustee, varying the deed, changing directors, or selling or transferring the property usually needs the funder's consent under the loan terms | You and the funder | A change made without telling the funder |
Document review is where most of these files stall, and it is also the one stage you can do before you apply. The last row is the one nobody mentions at the start: once the loan is in place, the structure is part of the security, so changes to the structure become the funder's business too. The changes that usually need consent are set out under what needs the funder's consent once the loan is in place.
What documents does a lender need for a company or trust?
For a trust, a lender needs the certified deed, every variation, and the resolution recording the trustee's decision to give the security; for a company, it needs the current extract, the constitution and a directors' resolution; and for either, identification for whoever signs. That is the full documentation set for whichever entity is on title, not the front page of the deed and a covering email, plus a current extract for any Pty Ltd appearing anywhere in the chain.
The reason the list is that specific is mechanical. A funder has to be able to trace an unbroken line from the deed that created the trust, through every change of trustee and every variation of powers, to the person signing the mortgage. A missing variation breaks that line. So does a change of trustee that was executed but never recorded, which happens more often than people expect when a family moves from an individual trustee to a corporate one and the accountant handles it without a formal deed of appointment. The company version of that line is shorter but it breaks the same way, from the constitution through the resolution to the signature.
What a lender-ready file contains
- Certified deed, stamped, with every variation attached
- Trustee resolution dated before the security documents
- Current company extract matching the deed and the title
- Title shows the trustee as proprietor with no surprises
- Deed carries an express power to mortgage and to guarantee
- Constitution produced in full and matching the current extract
- Directors' resolution dated before the security documents
What makes the file stall
- Deed provided as an unsigned or unstamped photocopy
- A variation referred to in the deed but not produced
- Trustee changed and never formally documented
- A director on the extract resigned without the change being lodged
- Power to secure another party's debt is absent or unclear
- Constitution that cannot be produced by the company or its adviser
- Directors' resolution signed after the security documents were drawn
Where a file lands in the right-hand column, the fix is almost always a deed of variation, a confirmatory deed or a replacement constitution prepared by the entity's own solicitor, not a different lender. That work sits outside the loan and it is worth starting it early, because it typically adds a document review step before formal approval, indicative and varies by lender.
A variation is made under the deed's own amendment power, and where the deed has no such power the fix may need a court application instead. The tax office's published view, in Taxation Determination TD 2012/21, is that a valid amendment under an existing power generally does not trigger a capital gains tax event, but a change that ends the existing trust or effectively resettles an asset on new terms can. That is why the trust's accountant should see the draft before it is signed, not after.
Duty is a separate question, and it is set state by state. In Victoria, for example, moving the title to a new trustee can be exempt from duty, but the State Revenue Office's change of trustee requirements ask for the deed of appointment and retirement, the duly stamped trust deed with every amendment, and statutory declarations from both trustees, lodged 30 days before settlement. An unstamped deed or an undocumented trustee change is therefore a timing problem as well as a paperwork one. Where the original deed is lost, the same office publishes a separate lost trust deed process built around a deed of confirmation and a statutory declaration about the search. Other states and territories publish their own rules, which the trust's solicitor will check for the state the property is in.
Where is each document, and what if one is missing?
Most of these documents are with the accountant or solicitor who set the structure up, and the ones that are genuinely missing are fixed by the entity's own solicitor, not by the funder.
| Document | Usually kept by | If it cannot be found |
|---|---|---|
| Trust deed, signed and stamped | The accountant or solicitor who set up the trust, the family's own papers, or a bank or funder the trust has dealt with before | A certified copy of a signed copy may be enough; where only an unsigned copy exists, or none, the trust's solicitor advises on a deed of confirmation or a court application |
| Deeds of variation and changes of trustee | Wherever the deed is, often filed separately, and the solicitor who acted on the change | The trust's own minutes and the solicitor who acted; an undocumented change of trustee is fixed by a confirmatory deed |
| Company constitution | The company's own records, kept by the company, its accountant or the service that registered it; it is not on the public register | Confirmation that the company relies on the replaceable rules, or a replacement constitution from the company's solicitor |
| Current company extract | The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's public register, ordered by your broker or solicitor | Always available; the only question is whether it is current and matches the title |
| Trustee or directors' resolution | Drafted for this transaction, usually by a solicitor | Nothing to find; it has to be signed and dated before the security documents |
| Title search | The state or territory land registry, ordered by your broker or solicitor | Always available; it shows who is registered, and rarely in what capacity |
Before you speak to any funder, ask your accountant for these, because they are the first things a funder's solicitor will ask for:
- A certified copy of the trust deed and every deed of variation or change of trustee, in date order.
- The constitution of the trustee company or the company that owns the property, and a current extract.
- The names of the current trustee, directors and appointor, and anyone whose consent the deed requires.
- The vesting date in the deed, and whether it has ever been changed.
- The latest financial statements and tax return for the entity on title and for the business that is borrowing, which the credit assessment will want anyway.
What is a trust deed and why does the lender read it?
A trust deed is the document that creates the trust and defines the trustee's powers, and a lender reads it because it is the only place those powers are written down. The title search tells a funder who is registered. The deed tells it whether that registration can lawfully be encumbered, by whom, and on what terms.
Four clauses do most of the work:
- The power to borrow.
- The power to mortgage or charge trust assets.
- The power to guarantee or indemnify a third party, which is a separate power and frequently absent where the borrowing power is present.
- The machinery clauses covering how the trustee makes and records a decision.
In practice, the clause that stops files is the third one, because the commercial situation people bring to a broker is usually a trust that owns the property and an operating company that needs the money.
The deed also tells a funder what happens on trustee default, whether the trustee has a right of indemnity out of trust assets, and whether that right has been limited or excluded. That right of indemnity matters more than it sounds: it is the mechanism by which a lender to a trustee reaches trust property in a recovery, and a deed that cuts it down changes the credit assessment even where the mortgage is validly given. The Australian Government Solicitor gives Commonwealth agencies the same instruction in its briefing on executing documents: obtain the trust deed to see whether the transaction is within the scope of the trust and how far the trustee is indemnified.
The deed also sets the vesting date, the date or event on which the beneficiaries' interests become fixed. After it, the trustee no longer has discretionary powers over income or capital, and the tax office's guidance on trust vesting says it is too late to change the vesting date once the trust has vested. A funder will typically read that date against the loan term, so a deed that vests part way through the facility is a conversation for the trust's solicitor before the application, not at settlement.
What needs the funder's consent once the loan is in place?
Most changes to the structure behind the security need the funder's consent once the loan has settled, because the structure is now part of what the funder is lending against. What happens if a change goes ahead without asking depends on the loan documents, but a change that breaches a covenant is commonly an event of default, which gives the funder rights it did not have the day before.
| Change | Why the funder cares | What to do first |
|---|---|---|
| Changing the trustee | The party that gave the mortgage changes, and the new trustee has to be bound by it and put on title | Get the funder's consent, then have the solicitor document the appointment and the title change together |
| A director of the trustee company retiring | Control of the company changes, and a guarantee the director signed does not end just because they resign | Ask the funder in writing whether that guarantee can be released or replaced before the director steps down |
| Adding beneficiaries or varying the deed | A variation can change the trustee's powers, and loan terms commonly restrict changes to the deed | Show the funder the draft variation, and the accountant its tax effect, before anything is signed |
| The vesting date approaching | After vesting the trustee loses its discretionary powers and the beneficiaries' interests become fixed | Deal with it well before the date, while the deed may still allow the date to be changed |
| Selling or transferring the property | The funder has to be paid out, or offered replacement security, before it releases the mortgage | Ask for a payout figure and the release conditions in writing early, and check whether the mortgage secures other debts |
Read the covenants and the default clauses in the loan agreement before changing anything, and ask the funder first rather than telling it afterwards.
This is one reason private lending and non-bank funders often move faster on trust-held security than major banks: the reading is the same, but the credit committee sits closer to the file.
For a wider read on how these funders assess security and pricing, the private lending overview covers the market structure, and how a private lender reads trust structures after the 2026 Budget covers the tax overlay that sits alongside the deed question.
Can a trust give security for a debt owed by a different company?
A trust can give security for a debt owed by a different entity, but only where the deed expressly permits it and the trustee can point to a benefit to the trust in doing so. This is the configuration most business owners are actually in: the family trust holds the premises, the operating company signs the contracts, and the funder is being asked to take a mortgage from a party that is not the borrower.
Three things have to line up:
- The deed must carry a power to guarantee, indemnify or secure the obligations of a third party, drafted widely enough to cover a company rather than only a beneficiary.
- The trustee has to make and record a decision that giving security for a debt that is not the trust's own is in the interests of the beneficiaries. That benefit usually rests on the trust receiving rent, distributions or some other tangible commercial return from the operating entity.
- The funder documents it as third party security, with its own set of instruments sitting alongside the loan agreement.
Where the beneficiary class and the shareholders of the operating company are the same family, the benefit argument is usually straightforward and the file moves. Where they are not, expect the question to be asked hard and expect the funder to want it answered in writing.
That is not obstruction. A security given without power or without benefit is a security a lender may not be able to rely on later, which is exactly what security position on title is really measuring.
The instruments themselves are the ordinary ones. A first or second-ranking mortgage registered against the trust-held title, a caveat where speed matters more than rank, or a combination. What changes is not the instrument, it is the authority chain behind the signature, and that is what determines whether a second mortgage against trust property settles in the timeframe the deal needs. Where the facility is to be secured over more than one title, add a consent and a release conversation per property, as set out in putting two properties behind one loan.
What the borrowed money is then used for is a separate test again, and one the deed does not answer. Where a trust-held title secures a short-term business facility, the purpose of the funds decides which statute governs the contract, which is set out in whether a caveat loan can be used for personal purposes.
Should the trust borrow, or should the company borrow with the trust as security?
Either can work, and the funder reads the file differently depending on which one is the borrower. Where the company borrows and the trust gives a mortgage, the trust is a third party giving security, so the deed needs the power to secure another party's debt and the trustee has to record the benefit to the trust. Where the trust borrows and lends the money on to the company, the trust is the borrower in its own right, so the deed needs the power to borrow and to lend, the funder assesses whether the trust can carry the debt, usually from the rent the company pays it, and the loan from the trust to the company is a separate arrangement the funder will want to see documented.
| Question | Company borrows, trust gives security | Trust borrows and lends to the company |
|---|---|---|
| Who the funder assesses | The company, as the borrower | The trust, as the borrower, then the company's ability to pay the trust |
| What the deed must allow | Securing the debt of another party, with a recorded benefit to the trust | Borrowing, mortgaging, and lending to the company |
| What else the funder reads | The third party security documents alongside the loan | The written loan agreement between the trust and the company |
| Who is usually asked to guarantee | The people who control the company and the trustee | The people who control the trustee, and often the company as well |
| Who claims the interest | A question for the accountant before the application | A question for the accountant before the application |
That last row is why a broker and an accountant can give different answers to the same question: one is solving for the credit file and the other for the tax return. Settle the tax side first, because once the loan documents name a borrower, changing it means starting again.
What if it is a unit trust and some unitholders are not in the business?
In a unit trust the trustee holds the property for every unitholder in proportion to their units, so putting it up for a debt owed by a company that only some of them own asks the others to carry the risk without the benefit. That is where the benefit question is asked hardest, and it is why a funder will commonly want the written consent of every unitholder, or a unitholders' resolution where the deed provides for one, alongside the trustee's own resolution. The unitholder who is not part of the business is the person the deed and the funder are protecting, so expect them to be asked to get independent legal advice before signing. If they will not agree, the property cannot safely be offered, and the realistic options become different security or a funder that lends on the company's own position.
Who signs when a company or corporate trustee owns the property?
A company signs through its directors, normally two directors or a sole director, and a corporate trustee signs the same way but also needs the power to come from the trust deed, so the company's documents and the deed both have to authorise the same signature. More generally, who signs depends on the ownership structure recorded on title, and a funder verifies the authority behind the signature before it verifies almost anything else about the deal. The question is always the same one, asked five different ways: who signs, and under what authority. The tiers below run from the simplest to the most constrained.
Individual owner
The registered proprietor signs personally, and the only real check is that the name on the title matches the name on the identification. Name changes through marriage, and titles registered under a shortened or anglicised given name, are the usual friction points and are cleared with a statutory declaration or a marriage certificate.
Joint owners
Every registered proprietor signs, together, because one owner cannot encumber another owner's interest. The practical constraint is availability rather than authority, and an owner who is overseas or otherwise unable to attend is the most common reason a joint-title file misses a settlement date.
Company owner
The company signs under its constitution, which normally means two directors, or a sole director where the company has only one. The rule that makes a company's signature binding on the company comes from the Corporations Act, and the mechanics of applying it are a question for the solicitor drawing the security documents rather than something a broker argues about.
What matters at the credit desk is narrower and it happens early. Before anything else about the deal is checked, a funder pulls a current company extract and matches it, together with the constitution, against the name on the title. A director who resigned without the change being lodged is the classic stall here, and it is fixed by lodging, not by arguing.
The harder version is a company that is also a corporate trustee, because there are then two document sets to satisfy at once, the company's own constitution and the trust deed, and both have to be right on the same day. A resolution that satisfies the constitution but not the deed is not authority, and neither is the reverse.
Where the company holds as trustee, the title is also less informative than owners expect. Some titles carry a notation that the proprietor holds in that capacity and some carry nothing at all, so the title confirms who is registered and says almost nothing about the capacity in which they hold it. The extract and the deed have to supply that, which is why a funder reads all three together rather than one at a time.
Discretionary trust
The trustee signs, in the manner the deed prescribes, and where the trustee is a company the company's own signing rules apply on top of the deed's. This is the tier where both document sets have to be right at once, and where the resolution has to be dated before the security documents rather than backfilled afterwards. See corporate trustee for how the two layers interact.
Self managed super fund
The trustee of the fund signs, under the fund's own deed, and the borrowing itself has to be permitted by superannuation law as well as by the deed. This is the most constrained tier and it is covered separately below.
| Ownership structure | Who signs | Documents required | Where it commonly stalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | The registered proprietor, personally | Photo identification, title search, evidence of loan purpose | Name on the title does not match the identification |
| Joint owners | Every registered proprietor, together | Identification for each owner, title search showing the tenancy | One owner is overseas or unavailable to sign |
| Company | Two directors, or a sole director, under the constitution | Company extract, constitution, directors' resolution | A director resigned and the change was never lodged |
| Discretionary trust | The trustee, individual or corporate, in the manner the deed prescribes | Certified deed, every variation, trustee resolution, company extract for a corporate trustee | The deed is unstamped or a variation cannot be produced |
| Self managed super fund | The trustee of the fund, under the fund deed | Certified fund deed, investment strategy, evidence the borrowing is permitted | The deed or the strategy does not contemplate the borrowing |
The same tier logic drives the deposit and equity conversation, not just the signing one. Commercial property loan deposits and the commercial property loans guide both assume a clean signing chain behind whatever equity is being contributed.
Do beneficiaries have to guarantee the loan?
Beneficiaries do not automatically guarantee a loan made to or secured by a trust, because a beneficiary of a discretionary trust holds an expectation rather than an entitlement and has no obligation for the trustee's debts. What funders usually ask for is a covenant from the people who actually control the structure, which is a different group, although some funders' policies also ask adult or principal beneficiaries to guarantee, particularly where the trust is borrowing for itself.
That group is usually the directors and shareholders of the corporate trustee, sometimes the appointor, and in a family arrangement often the same two people wearing several hats. The commercial logic is simple: a corporate trustee is frequently a shelf company with no assets other than its trusteeship, so a funder wants a covenant from a party with substance behind it.
Where the trust is a unit trust rather than a discretionary one, unitholders hold a defined proportionate interest, and a funder will look at whether that unit interest is worth taking as security in its own right, alongside the security over the property itself.
Beneficiaries do become relevant in one specific way, and it is worth knowing before the deed is opened. Some deeds require the consent of a named beneficiary or of the appointor before the trustee can mortgage trust property. Where that clause exists, the consent is not optional and it is not something a lender will waive. It is a condition of the trustee having the power at all, and a mortgage granted without it is exposed. The consent is given in writing and dated before the trustee's resolution, and both go into the security pack with the certified deed.
What a covenant of that kind actually exposes the signer to, how far it reaches and how it comes off again, is a whole question of its own and it is answered in full in the guide to giving a guarantee for a company debt. For the narrower case of a relative putting their own title behind a business debt, see using someone else's property as security. Regional and specialised security adds a further layer again, which the regional property finance guide covers in more detail.
What are you putting at risk when the trust secures the business's debt?
When a trust or a landholding company secures a debt owed by the operating business, the property is available to the funder if the business cannot repay, whatever the reason it was put in a separate entity in the first place. Add the guarantees the people in control are usually asked to sign, and much of the separation between the business and the property no longer applies to that debt. That is a question for the entity's solicitor and accountant before the documents are signed, and it is one reason some funders ask third party mortgagors and guarantors to get independent legal advice first.
Do not assume an industry code protects the entity giving the security. Where the funder is a bank that has signed up to the Banking Code of Practice, the Code's specific protections for guarantors are written for guarantors who are individuals, so a company, including a corporate trustee, giving the security generally sits outside them, and a non-bank or private funder is not a bank, so that Code does not apply to it at all. The standard that does travel is the one a court has set for the advice itself: the Law Society of New South Wales journal notes that a third party guarantor must be given competent, independent and objective advice on the purpose and effect of the transaction.
Two more things are worth reading before signing. Some funders also take a general security over the trust's or the company's other assets, not only a mortgage over the property. And many security documents secure everything the borrower or the mortgagor owes that funder, now or later, rather than only this loan, which matters the day the business takes a second facility or the property needs to come out; that wording is explained in the all monies clause in a commercial mortgage.
What stops a company owned property being used as security?
Four document problems stop most company-held security files: a constitution that restricts giving security, a constitution that cannot be produced, a trustee capacity that the title, the extract and the deed record differently, and a sole-director company meeting a credit policy written for two signatures. What stops these files is almost never the law and almost always the file, because the documents a lender needs from a company are easy to name and, on an older company, surprisingly hard to produce. None of these problems is published anywhere: no regulator and no industry body sets out the lender's side of this, so what follows is our own observation from files we have worked on rather than a rule that can be looked up.
The constitution restricts giving security. This is the same shape as the deed problem further up, one layer down, with one difference worth knowing: a company generally has the powers of an individual unless its constitution restricts them, so a constitution that says nothing about security is rarely the obstacle, while one that expressly limits mortgaging the company's property, or securing a debt that is not the company's own, is. A funder that knows about a restriction will not rely on the security until it is removed. The remedy is an amended or replacement constitution, adopted by special resolution of the members before the security documents are drawn. Separately, where the company is securing a debt that is not its own, whether a related company's or a director's personal borrowing, the directors have to be able to show the company itself gets a benefit from giving the security, which lawyers and funders call corporate benefit, and a funder will want that recorded in the resolution. Where the borrower is the operating entity and the company on title is a separate landholding vehicle, that restriction is the first thing a funder's solicitor looks for, and the question of which entity ought to hold the premises in the first place is dealt with in the guide to buying your premises from your landlord.
The constitution cannot be produced at all. This is common in companies incorporated decades ago, and in companies registered through an agent that has since closed. An extract can always be pulled; a constitution cannot. Where none exists or none can be found, the replaceable rules may apply instead, which is a different document set again and one a funder has to be told about rather than left to discover. The fix is a replacement or confirmatory document from the company's own solicitor, and it sits outside the loan.
The company holds as trustee and the title, the extract and the deed do not agree. A trustee capacity recorded on one document and not on the others is the version of the third party security problem that surfaces at settlement rather than at approval, which is the expensive end of the file. It is found by reading all three side by side, which is why a funder asks for all three at the start rather than on demand, and why a corporate trustee file is worth assembling before it is worth submitting.
A sole-director company is meeting a policy written for two signatures. This one is not a legal problem at all, it is a document-checking one. A single-director company signs validly; a credit policy drafted around two signatures simply needs evidence of the position, and that is supplied by the extract rather than settled by argument. It is the fastest of the four to clear and the one most likely to be mistaken for a decline while it is being cleared.
What these four have in common is sequence rather than severity. Each is fixed by the company's own solicitor before the security documents are drawn, not during, and each adds time to the file rather than causing a decline. A company-held title that arrives with its constitution, a current extract and a resolution already in order behaves like any other property security, and where the property is tenanted, the way that tenancy is read is a separate question again, covered in passive against owner-operated commercial property. A title that arrives without those documents simply waits.
| What stops it | What the lender actually needs | Who fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| The constitution restricts giving security, or securing another party's debt | A constitution with no such restriction, or an amended one that removes it | The company's own solicitor |
| The constitution cannot be produced | The constitution itself, confirmation that the company relies on the replaceable rules, or a replacement constitution | The company's own solicitor |
| The company holds as trustee and the title, extract and deed disagree | One consistent record of the trustee capacity across all three | The trust's solicitor, before settlement |
| A sole-director company against a two-signature policy | A current company extract showing a single director | The broker, with the extract |
What if the property is held in a self managed super fund instead?
A self managed super fund is the most constrained holder of all, because superannuation law sits over the top of the deed and narrows what the trustee may do even where the deed is generous. A fund cannot simply mortgage its property to raise money for something else. Borrowing is permitted only through a limited recourse borrowing arrangement, which carries its own requirements about the holding trust, the asset acquired and the lender's recourse.
The date to have in front of you is 10 August 2026, when the rules changed for what a new arrangement is allowed to acquire, as the ATO sets out in its guidance on changes to limited recourse borrowing arrangements. That change, the business real property test behind it and the carve-outs that go with it are covered in full in the guide to fund property loans and business real property. Whether a particular parcel meets the test is a question for the fund's own adviser or its SMSF accountant before it is a question for a broker, and if a fund borrowing is being contemplated that timing is the first conversation, not the last.
Who holds title is the router for every property-secured decision. An individual signs personally, a company signs under its constitution, a trustee signs under the deed, and a fund trustee signs under the deed and superannuation law together. What changes is the authority behind the signature, the document set a funder needs to verify it, and how long that takes. Get the authority documents together before the credit conversation and a company-held or trust-held file behaves like any other. Leave them to the end and the file stalls on paperwork rather than on credit. And once the loan settles, the structure is part of the security, so ask the funder before changing the trustee, the directors or the deed.
Key takeaway: Pull the constitution or the certified deed, and every variation, before you approach a funder, because the authority document decides what security you can give long before a lender decides what it will lend.Frequently Asked Questions
A lost original trust deed does not end the file, but it has to be dealt with before the security documents are drawn. Start with everyone who might hold a signed copy: the accountant, the solicitor who set the trust up, former trustees, and any bank or funder the trust has dealt with before. Where a signed copy turns up, the trust’s solicitor can usually confirm it; where only an unsigned copy exists, or nothing at all, the remedy may be a court application, and that takes time a settlement date may not have. Revenue offices have their own process too: in Victoria, the State Revenue Office asks for a deed of confirmation, a statutory declaration setting out the steps taken to find the original, and evidence of the trust’s assets such as recent financial statements and tax returns. Whether a copy is acceptable for this particular loan is still the funder’s call. See trust deed.
No single rule covers every loan, but many funders make independent legal advice a condition of settlement for a third party mortgagor or guarantor, and a court has said the advice a third party guarantor receives must be competent, independent and objective. Where the funder is a bank that has signed up to the Banking Code of Practice, the Code adds its own steps for guarantors who are individuals; a company or corporate trustee giving the security generally sits outside those, and a non-bank funder is not bound by that Code at all. Build the advice into the timetable rather than treating it as optional. See giving a guarantee for a company debt.
The vesting date matters because it is the point at which the beneficiaries’ interests become fixed and the trustee loses its discretionary powers, so a funder wants to know it falls after the end of the loan term. Where it falls inside the term, the deed may allow the trustee to extend it, which has to happen before the trust vests; where the deed gives no such power, the change needs a court. Either way it is a question for the trust’s solicitor and accountant before the application goes in.
A loan in a company name to buy or hold residential property is possible, but it is not the ordinary residential lane and most mainstream funders will not write it. A company borrowing against residential property is generally assessed as commercial or specialist lending, against the company’s own position and the security offered, with the people behind the company covenanting for it, rather than as a home loan. Where the property is held for the family rather than for the business, the tax and duty treatment is a question for your accountant before it is a question for a broker. See commercial property loans.
A company can buy a house for a director to live in, and the funding is the hard part rather than the buying. Mainstream lenders will generally not fund a company acquiring a residential home for a director to occupy rent free under a standard arrangement, so these deals usually go to a specialist or private funder on commercial terms with a clear view of what income services the debt. The tax treatment of a director occupying a company owned property is a separate question again, and one for your accountant rather than your broker. See private lending.
FBAA Accredited
