How to Release Equity Across a Group of Companies and Trusts
Equity Release
Guide
When one company or trust owns the property and another entity needs the cash, the job is to release usable equity without creating a security package that becomes expensive or difficult to unwind later. This guide covers the three routes, how much may be available, first-mortgagee consent, who signs, guarantees and GSA/PPSR security, Division 7A, costs, documents, settlement and the exit.
Quick Answer
When property equity sits in one company or trust and another entity needs the money, the usual routes are pooled third-party security, separate facilities linked by guarantees, or the property-owning entity borrowing and on-lending the funds.
The right structure depends on the amount you can actually release, who must sign, whether an existing first mortgage stays in place, what additional guarantees or business-asset security the lender takes, the tax and legal position, and how easily you need to sell, refinance or remove one entity later. Structure the exit before comparing the rate.
Also called: cross-entity equity release, related-entity equity release, third-party property security, cross-security. People also search for using equity in a trust property for a company loan, borrowing against company property for another entity, first-mortgagee consent, cross-collateralised group lending and inter-company loan security. This guide is about business borrowing, not retirement equity release such as a reverse mortgage or the Home Equity Access Scheme.
What are the three ways to release equity across a group of companies and trusts?
You can release equity across a group of companies and trusts in three ways: one facility with each property-owning entity giving a third-party mortgage, separate facilities joined by guarantees, or the property-owning entity borrowing in its own name and lending the money on.
The choice is less about the rate than about three practical things: who the lender treats as the borrower, who has to sign, and how hard it is to separate the entities later. Those three decide what the lender reads at application, what each entity is exposed to while the loan runs, and what it costs you in time and consent when one entity wants to sell or leave. That is why a group release is usually structured as an equity release refinance of the whole picture rather than a top-up on one title.
Banks, non-bank lenders and private lenders may accept one or more of these structures, but which routes they will use and how far they require guarantees to reach varies by lender and transaction. The Reserve Bank reported in February 2026 that competition in business credit has increased on non-price factors such as collateral, documentation and approval time, and that the non-bank share of business lending has grown strongly since 2022, especially for smaller loans to SMEs. In practice, that makes lender selection part of the structure, not a separate decision. Non-bank and private lenders can be relevant where a bank's group-wide security or guarantee policy is the obstacle.
Can you use equity in a trust property for another company's loan?
Yes, potentially. A trust-held property can support borrowing used by another company through a third-party mortgage, or the trustee can borrow in its own name and on-lend the funds. The trust deed must permit the transaction, the trustee must have authority to sign, the trust needs a defensible benefit from the arrangement, and the lender must accept the structure.
If the group is only two entities, a trust holding the premises and the trading company that uses them, the mechanics are simpler and are covered in the guide on when only a trust and one company are involved.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| What changes | One facility, third-party mortgages | Separate facilities with guarantees | Owning entity borrows and on-lends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who the lender treats as the borrower | The entity that needs the money | Each entity for its own facility | The property-owning entity |
| Who signs security | Every entity whose title is in the pool, each as a third-party mortgagor | Each entity over its own title, plus guarantees between entities or from directors | Only the owning entity, over its own titles |
| What each signing entity must be able to show | Power in its constitution or trust deed to secure another entity's debt, and a benefit to itself | Power to guarantee, and a benefit to the guarantor | Power to borrow and to lend, and a documented loan to the operating entity |
| How the lender measures the security | Across the pooled titles | Title by title, facility by facility | Against the owning entity's titles |
| Whose income services the debt | The borrower's, often read with the group | Each borrower's, with the guarantors read behind them | The owning entity's, usually rent or repayments from the operating entity |
| Tax questions to raise with your accountant | Whether a company's mortgage counts as a guarantee for a shareholder's or associate's benefit under Division 7A | The same question, for any company guarantee | The terms of the inter-entity loan, and where the interest is deductible |
| When one entity wants to sell | Usually needs the lender's consent and a paydown to release that title | Simpler: the facility over that title is repaid | Simpler at the lender; the inter-entity loan still has to be dealt with |
| If one entity defaults | Every title in the pool is exposed | Guarantees can reach the other entities | The owning entity owes the lender; the operating entity owes the owning entity under the inter-entity loan |
Sources: Corporations Act 2001 s181 and s187, legislation.gov.au, Compilation No. 148, 27 August 2026, read 25 September 2026; ATO TD 2025/6, 24 September 2025, read 25 September 2026; RBA Bulletin, Recent Changes in Credit Markets and Their Implications for Monetary Policy, 26 February 2026, read 25 September 2026.
Pooling titles is a form of cross-collateralisation, which is what makes the first route the hardest to unwind later. On the second route, if a director or family member is asked to guarantee, what that exposes them to is covered in using the family home to secure a business loan.
A family trust owns a warehouse leased to the trading company, a separate company owns an investment property, and the trading company needs working capital. On the first route, the trading company borrows and both the trust and the property company give third-party mortgages into one pool. On the second, the trust and the property company each take their own facility and guarantee each other, with the directors guaranteeing behind them. On the third, the trust borrows against the warehouse in its own name and lends the funds to the trading company under a written loan. The question that usually decides it is whether the family wants to be able to sell the investment property on its own later.
How much equity can you actually release across different entities?
The amount you can actually release is not the total equity shown on paper. A lender starts with the security value it is willing to accept, applies the LVR and cash-out policy it will use for that property and purpose, deducts debt that must remain or be refinanced, and then checks the borrower, related entities, serviceability or exit strategy and any conditions attached to the security.
If a lender accepts two properties as a combined security pool, it may assess the facility against the combined accepted value rather than the equity in each title separately. A title with more spare equity can therefore support one with less, but both titles then sit behind the same debt and releasing one later may require a revaluation and paydown. With separate facilities, each loan is instead tested against its own title and the guarantees linking the entities.
What does a group equity release cost beyond the interest rate?
A group equity release can cost more to set up than a single-property loan because many costs are charged per title or per signing entity. Expect valuations, legal work, independent advice and accounting work to multiply as more entities and properties enter the structure.
None of these costs is fixed. Count them before comparing offers, because a lower rate on a structure that drags every entity into the security can cost more overall than a narrower structure at a higher rate.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Cost | Why a group adds to it | When it usually arises |
|---|---|---|
| Valuations | Each title offered as security is usually valued separately | After the lender issues its conditional approval, before formal approval |
| Lender's legal costs | Security documents are prepared for each mortgagor and each guarantor | Charged to the borrower at or before settlement |
| Your own solicitor | Each constitution, deed and resolution is checked and settled | Before the security documents are signed |
| Independent legal advice | Lenders commonly require it for each guarantor and third-party mortgagor | Before signing, and it can hold up settlement if booked late |
| Accountant | Division 7A review, the loan agreement between entities on the on-lend route, and current financials for each entity the lender reads | Before you choose the route, ideally |
| Existing lender exit | Each existing facility being refinanced may carry discharge fees, and break costs if it is on a fixed rate | At settlement |
| Registration | A mortgage is registered, and any old one discharged, on each title | At settlement |
| Releasing a title later (partial discharge) | On the pooled route, taking one title out usually needs lender consent, a revaluation of what remains, and new documents | Whenever one property is sold or refinanced |
General information from broking files, not a quote. Costs vary by lender, state and structure, as at September 2026.
The general costs and timing of any cash-out refinance, including discharge and faster refinance options, are set out in what a cash-out refinance costs and how long it takes; the table above only adds what a group multiplies.
The last row is the one most people only meet later. If two or more properties are going behind one facility, the consent and release questions are set out in putting two properties behind one loan, and it is worth reading before the documents are signed, not when a sale is already on the table.
Which route should you use for your group?
Choose the route by what you will need to do later, not by the rate. If you may sell or refinance one property on its own, separate facilities usually fit; if no single title has enough equity, a pooled facility may be the only way; and if one entity holds the equity, borrowing and on-lending keeps the lender's view simple.
Most people searching this have one of a handful of situations in front of them. The table matches each one to the route that usually fits and the thing that most often goes wrong with it.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Your situation | Route that usually fits | Why | What to watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| You may want to sell or refinance one property on its own in the next few years | Separate facilities with guarantees | Each title sits behind its own facility, so one can be repaid without recalculating the rest | The guarantees still link the entities until the lender agrees to release them |
| No single title has enough equity to cover what you need | One facility with third-party mortgages | The lender measures the combined value of every title in the pool | The hardest route to unwind, and every pooled title is exposed if the borrower defaults |
| One entity holds most of the equity and another needs the money | Owning entity borrows and on-lends | The lender deals with one borrower and reads one set of titles | The loan between your entities needs written terms, and your accountant needs to see it before settlement |
| The property-owning entity has little income of its own | The trading entity borrows, with the owning entity giving a mortgage or guarantee | The lender services the debt from the entity that actually earns the income | The owning entity must be able to show a benefit to itself, recorded in its resolution |
| One entity has overdue tax, arrears or losses | Deal with that entity first, and ask whether it can sit outside the security | A weak entity in the pool can cut back what the whole group can release | Leaving it off the application does not hide it; lenders read related entities anyway |
| Your bank wants every related entity to guarantee | Compare lenders before accepting a group-wide package | Lenders apply their own credit policy to how far guarantees must reach | A narrower package usually costs more, so compare total cost, not the rate alone |
General patterns from broking files, not advice. Every lender and every structure is assessed on its own facts, as at September 2026.
If an entity with a tax debt is the obstacle, how the debt can be cleared out of the loan proceeds is covered in how an ATO debt gets paid out at settlement. If the bank will only lend on a group-wide guarantee, private and non-bank lenders are where a narrower structure is usually tested.
What makes a company or trust's mortgage for another entity's debt hold up?
A company's or trust's mortgage for another entity's debt holds up when the entity giving it has the power to give it, the people signing have authority to sign, and giving it genuinely benefits that entity, not only the entity that borrows.
For a company, the test starts with the directors' duty. Under section 181(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, directors and officers must exercise their powers in good faith in the best interests of the corporation and for a proper purpose. That duty is owed to the company giving the mortgage or guarantee, not to the group. A company backing a sister company's loan therefore needs a real benefit to itself, which lawyers and lenders call corporate benefit, and the directors' resolution is where that benefit is recorded.
There is one statutory shortcut, and it is narrow. Under section 187, a director of a wholly-owned subsidiary is taken to act in good faith in the subsidiary's best interests if all three conditions hold: the subsidiary's constitution expressly authorises the director to act in the best interests of the holding company, the director acts in good faith in the best interests of the holding company, and the subsidiary is not insolvent when the director acts and does not become insolvent because of the act. It covers wholly-owned subsidiaries only. It does not help sister companies, and it does not help trusts.
For a trust, the deed and the benefit do the same work. The deed must allow the trustee to secure another party's debt, and the trustee must be able to point to a benefit to the trust. The detail sits in the guide on what the trust deed has to allow; where the trustee is a company, its directors sign as corporate trustee.
Why lenders care. Security given without power or benefit is security a lender may not be able to rely on later. So lenders ask for resolutions from each entity and, often, independent legal advice for each one, and they read the whole group before they read the property. How they do that is set out in how lenders read a group of companies and trusts. Where a director is also asked for a director's guarantee, that sits on top of the entity's own security.
Does the existing first mortgagee need to agree before you use the equity?
Sometimes. If the existing first mortgage stays in place, check its loan and mortgage terms before assuming another lender can simply sit behind it. The first lender may restrict further mortgages or other security, and the incoming lender may require first-mortgagee consent, a priority arrangement or another acceptable security position before it will advance funds. If the first facility is refinanced and discharged instead, the new lender coordinates the payout and replacement mortgage at settlement. A caveat or other security is not a universal workaround: whether it is available or acceptable depends on the transaction, lender and applicable state law.
So spare equity and usable equity are different things. A valuation can support the numbers while the existing lender's documents or the proposed lender's security requirements still prevent the release from working in the form you expected.
What security can a lender take besides the property mortgage?
A lender can take more than a mortgage over the real property. Depending on the borrower and transaction, the security package can also include director or company guarantees and a General Security Agreement over personal property of a business entity. A security interest created over personal property can be registered on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR). The PPSR is a register of security interests, not property ownership, and a general security agreement can be drafted to cover broad classes of business assets, so read exactly what collateral it describes before signing.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Role | What that role means | What to check before signing |
|---|---|---|
| Borrower | The entity that owes the loan to the lender | Who receives the loan, what the funds are for and how the debt is serviced or repaid |
| Mortgagor | The entity that gives a mortgage over real property; it can be different from the borrower | Power to mortgage, benefit, existing first-mortgage restrictions and what debt the mortgage secures |
| Guarantor | A person or entity that promises to answer for another party's debt if the guarantee is enforced | Guarantee limit, continuing obligations, release conditions and whether it extends to future facilities |
| GSA grantor | The entity that gives a security interest over personal property or business assets under a general security agreement | What collateral is covered, whether present and after-acquired property is included, and what PPSR registration will be made |
Personal-property security: The PPSR describes itself as a register of security interests in personal property, not a register of ownership, and lists general security agreements over company assets among the security interests that can be registered. See PPSR, why register on the PPSR, read 25 September 2026.
When a company gives the security
- The constitution allows guarantees and third-party security
- A directors' resolution records the corporate benefit to the company
- For a wholly-owned subsidiary, the constitution expressly allows acting in the holding company's interests
- The company is solvent and stays solvent
- Each signatory holds authority on the day
When a trustee gives the security
- The deed gives power to secure another party's debt
- The trustee's resolution records the benefit to the trust
- Every deed variation is on file
- A corporate trustee's directors sign as trustee
- The beneficiaries' position is checked if the deed requires it
Can moving released equity between your entities create a tax problem?
Moving released equity between your entities can create a Division 7A problem, but not automatically. The ATO has named specific arrangements where a private company backing a related party's borrowing may be treated as paying a dividend, and whether yours is one of them is a question for your accountant before settlement.
Why the confusion exists. Summaries online say any company security or guarantee "can trigger" Division 7A. The ATO's own documents are narrower. Taxpayer Alert TA 2024/2 describes arrangements where a private company guarantees a financial institution's loan to a related private company, which then pays or lends the money on to the first company's shareholders or their associates; the ATO says a deemed unfranked dividend may arise and that Part IVA may apply. TD 2025/6 adds that under section 109U the guaranteed lender can be any entity, including a bank, but the entity making the payment or loan to the shareholder or associate must be a private company.
A mortgage is treated like a guarantee. For Division 7A, a guarantee includes providing security for a loan, so a company giving a third-party mortgage on the pooled route is in the same position as a company signing a guarantee on the separate-facilities route (TD 2025/6, referring to section 109ZD).
Most group guarantees are not the target. Section 109U only deems a payment when every condition is met, including that a reasonable person would conclude the guarantee was given solely or mainly as part of an arrangement to get money to a shareholder or associate, and that the private company paying or lending to them has too little distributable surplus to cover it. The ATO says it recognises that banks commonly ask related entities for guarantees, and that it will focus on arrangements with artificial or contrived elements rather than cases where a genuine complying loan under section 109N is in place (TD 2025/6).
Interest follows the use of the money. Whether interest is deductible depends on what the borrowed money is used for, not on which property secures it. The ATO's ruling TR 95/25 gives the example of a second borrowing used privately: the interest is not deductible even if a rental property is the security. The lender asks the same question from its own side, set out in the guide on what a lender asks about the purpose of the funds.
An unpaid trust distribution is not, by itself, a loan. In Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel [2026] HCA 18, decided 10 June 2026, the High Court held that a trust's unpaid present entitlement to a company beneficiary is not, without more, a Division 7A loan, and the ATO's decision impact statement of 26 June 2026 says it will withdraw TD 2022/11. The same statement says an entitlement already placed on complying section 109N loan terms is still a loan, so its repayments continue, and it warns that Subdivision EA and section 100A can still apply, which matters when the family or discretionary trust is the entity borrowing and lending the money on.
If the plan involves moving a property itself rather than its equity, transfer duty and capital gains tax come into it, and those are covered in the guide on moving a property between entities. Whichever shape you are considering, take it to your accountant before the loan settles, not after.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Arrangement | What the ATO or the High Court has said | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| A private company guarantees a bank loan to a related private company, which pays or lends the money on to the first company's shareholders or their associates | A deemed unfranked dividend may arise and Part IVA may apply (TA 2024/2) | Section 109U |
| The company gives a mortgage over its property rather than a guarantee | Providing security counts as a guarantee; the guaranteed lender can be a bank, but the entity paying the shareholder or associate must be a private company (TD 2025/6) | Sections 109U and 109ZD |
| Where the ATO says it will focus its compliance work | Arrangements with artificial or contrived elements, not cases where a genuine complying loan is made to the shareholder or associate (TD 2025/6) | Sections 109U and 109N |
| The borrower defaults and the guaranteeing company pays the lender | Section 109UA may also apply (TA 2024/2) | Section 109UA |
| Equity released against one entity's property is used privately by another | Interest on borrowed money used privately is not deductible even if a rental property is the security (TR 95/25) | Section 8-1 ITAA 1997 |
| A trust owes a company beneficiary an unpaid entitlement | Not, by itself, a Division 7A loan (Bendel [2026] HCA 18); one already on complying loan terms stays a loan, and Subdivision EA and section 100A may still apply (ATO decision impact statement) | Section 109D, Subdivision EA, section 100A |
Sources: ATO TA 2024/2, 11 December 2024; ATO TD 2025/6, 24 September 2025, paragraphs 1, 5, 6 and 23 to 26; ATO TR 95/25, paragraph 50; High Court of Australia, Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel [2026] HCA 18, 10 June 2026; ATO Bendel decision impact statement, 26 June 2026; all read 25 September 2026. General information only; your accountant confirms the position for your structure.
A company owns its premises and its director's family trust needs funds. On the first shape, the bank lends straight to the trust with the company's mortgage behind it, so the lender paying the trust is a bank, not a private company. On the second, the bank lends to another company in the group, which lends the money on to the trust. The second shape is the one the ATO has described in TA 2024/2. Before choosing, the director takes both shapes to their accountant.
What happens between the first call and settlement?
A group equity release runs through the same stages as any property loan, with one extra layer at almost every stage: each entity that signs has to prove it can, and each title has to be valued and documented. In our experience that makes it a matter of weeks rather than days, and the stages below show where the time goes.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Stage | What happens | Who does it | Where it commonly stalls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Map the group | List every company and trust, who controls it, which titles it holds and what it owes | You and your accountant | Nobody has one current picture of the structure |
| 2. Test the tax shape | The accountant checks the proposed route for Division 7A and the terms of any loan between entities | Your accountant | The tax question is raised after the lender has already been chosen |
| 3. Choose the route and lender | The broker matches the route to lenders whose policy fits the whole group | Your broker | A lender insists on guarantees from every related entity |
| 4. Conditional approval | The lender assesses the borrower and reads each related entity's financials | The lender | One entity has overdue tax, arrears or losses |
| 5. Valuations | Each title in the security is valued | A valuer the lender appoints | A value below expectation reduces what can be released |
| 6. Entity documents | Constitutions, deeds, variations and resolutions are checked for power and benefit | The lender's solicitor and yours | A deed allows borrowing but not securing another party's debt, or a resolution is dated after the documents |
| 7. Advice and signing | Guarantors and third-party mortgagors get independent legal advice, then every entity signs | Each signer and their solicitor | One signer is unavailable or books advice late |
| 8. Settlement | Mortgages are registered on each title, existing loans are paid out and funds are released | Both solicitors | A document fixed late moves the settlement date |
| 9. After settlement | Selling or refinancing a title, changing a trustee or control, asking to release a guarantor, or removing a GSA/PPSR registration can require lender consent, a paydown or replacement documents | You, your advisers and the lender | The group restructures first and asks the lender afterwards |
Stages 1 and 2 are the ones you control, and they are where most group files are won or lost. The full list of documents a lender asks for across a group is set out in what a lender needs across a group of companies and trusts, and the trust-specific set in the documents a lender needs for a company or trust.
From our broking desk. General observations, not a quote or offer. Reviewed 25 September 2026.
What most often cuts a group release back is not the value of the property. It is one entity in the pool with its own arrears or tax debt, a trust deed that allows borrowing but not securing someone else's debt, or a lender that wants every related entity to guarantee. Gathering the constitutions, deeds, resolutions and financials for several entities usually takes weeks, not days. The groups that settle most smoothly are the ones that took the proposed structure to their accountant before choosing a lender.
Indicative only, based on Switchboard broking files as at September 2026. Every lender and every structure is assessed on its own facts.
What should you sort out before you speak to a lender?
Before you speak to a lender, have a one-page map of your entities, ask your accountant to check the tax shape of the route you prefer, and ask your solicitor whether each entity's constitution or deed allows what that route needs it to sign.
Bring these to the first conversation with a broker, because they decide which lenders are worth approaching:
- A one-page group structure chart showing every company, trust, trustee, director and controller
- A property and debt schedule showing which entity owns each title, the current lender and the current balance
- The latest financials and tax position for the borrower and any entity likely to guarantee or give security
- Company constitutions, complete trust deeds and every deed variation for entities that may sign
- How much you need to release, which entity ultimately needs the money and exactly what the funds will be used for
- Whether the existing lender is being refinanced out or expected to stay in first position
- Whether you may want to sell, refinance, transfer or remove any property or entity from the structure in the next few years
- Any overdue tax, arrears or payment arrangements anywhere in the group, not only in the proposed borrower
Questions to ask your accountant
- Does the route we prefer raise a Division 7A question? In particular, whether any private company in the group would be guaranteeing or giving security for money that reaches a shareholder or associate.
- If one entity lends to another, what terms should the loan have? Including interest, repayment and whether a written agreement is needed before settlement.
- Where will the interest be deductible? Based on what each entity will actually use the money for.
- Are the latest financials and tax lodgements current for every entity the lender will read?
Your accountant answers for your structure; this list only helps you ask.
Questions to ask your solicitor
- Does each constitution and trust deed allow the entity to borrow, lend, guarantee or secure another party's debt? Including every variation.
- How should each entity record the benefit it gets from signing?
- Who needs independent legal advice, and can it be booked early?
- Do the security documents secure only this loan, or everything owed to the lender now and later?
General information, not legal advice. Get independent legal advice before any entity signs.
That last question matters most on the pooled route, where the wording is explained in the all monies clause in a commercial mortgage. If a director is being asked to sign personally as well, read giving a guarantee for a company debt first.
Questions to ask the broker before choosing the lender
- Which entities does this lender insist on bringing into the deal? Ask separately about borrowers, mortgagors, guarantors and any entity expected to give a GSA or other PPSR security.
- If one property is sold later, what has to happen before the lender releases it? Ask whether a revaluation, minimum remaining security level or compulsory paydown applies.
- Can the existing first lender stay in place? If so, ask whether first-mortgagee consent, a priority arrangement or another agreed security position is required, and what happens if consent is refused or delayed.
- What happens if the group changes after settlement? Ask about trustee changes, director or control changes, business sales, entity restructures, removal of a guarantor, partial discharge of a title and release of any PPSR registrations.
A cheaper rate is not cheaper if the security package makes the next transaction harder or forces a refinance you did not plan.
What usually happens next
- The bank has already said noWork out whether it was lender policy or a real credit problem before applying again
- A related entity owes the ATOSee how the debt can be paid out from the loan at settlement
- Your properties are already tied togetherGet off cross-collateralisation before the next refinance
- The lender is asking about entities that are not borrowingUnderstand how lenders draw the boundary around your group
- A director is leaving or wants to be releasedResigning does not end a guarantee; see how release works
- You would rather move the property than its equityCheck duty and capital gains tax before restructuring
Each of these is a separate question with its own guide; start with the one that describes where you are now.
Start with the commercial outcome, not the loan product: which entity needs the money, how much can actually be released, whether the first mortgage stays, which properties, guarantees and business assets you are willing to expose, and what you expect to sell, refinance or restructure later. Then test the legal and tax shape before choosing the lender. Every signing entity needs authority and a defensible reason to sign, and every extra title, guarantor or GSA can add cost and friction.
Key takeaway: the right structure gets the money where it is needed without making the next sale, refinance or restructure harder than it needs to be.Frequently asked questions
Potentially, if its constitution allows the guarantee and its directors can properly conclude that giving it is in that company's interests. Section 187's special rule applies to a wholly-owned subsidiary acting for its holding company, not to sister companies. The wider lender view is explained in how lenders assess group structures.
It can. TD 2025/6 explains that for Division 7A a guarantee can include providing security for a loan, so a private company's mortgage over its property for a related party's borrowing can fall within the guarantee rules. That does not mean a deemed dividend automatically arises; the statutory conditions still have to be satisfied. See the related structure guide on property held in a trust or company as security.
No. Section 109U applies only when all its conditions are met, including that a reasonable person would conclude the guarantee was given solely or mainly as part of an arrangement to get money to a shareholder or associate, and that the private company paying them has too little distributable surplus. The ATO says it focuses on artificial or contrived arrangements (TD 2025/6). Your accountant confirms where your arrangement sits.
Potentially. Section 187 can treat directors of a wholly-owned subsidiary as acting in the subsidiary's best interests where the constitution expressly permits them to act in the holding company's interests, they act in good faith for the holding company, and the subsidiary is solvent and does not become insolvent because of the act. Lenders still review the complete group structure and security package.
In a pooled facility the lender broadly divides the total debt by the combined value of every title in the pool; with separate facilities it measures each loan against its own title. Pooling lets a title with spare equity support one with less, but it also means one title cannot usually come out without the lender recalculating the rest. The cash-out limits themselves are covered in how cash-out limits and evidence work.
Usually, but a pooled facility commonly requires the lender to approve a partial discharge and may require a revaluation or paydown before that title is released. With separate facilities, the loan secured by that property can be simpler to repay and discharge. The practical steps are covered in getting off cross-collateralisation.
No. Only the entities that borrow, give security or guarantee sign, and which ones that is depends on the route. In a pooled facility every entity whose title is in the pool signs a mortgage; with separate facilities each borrower signs, plus any entity that guarantees; when one entity borrows and on-lends, only that entity signs the loan and security, although the lender may still ask directors to guarantee.
Security does not decide deductibility by itself. The ATO's TR 95/25 says the character of interest generally follows the use of the borrowed funds and all the surrounding circumstances, so using an income-producing property as security does not turn private use of the borrowed money into deductible interest. Your accountant should trace the actual use of the funds, especially where money is moving between a property-owning entity and another company.
FBAA Accredited
